Hartson v. United States
United States Court of Claims
The Reporters1 statement of tbe case: Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion of tbe court.
1Opinion of the Court
Richabdson, Cb. J.,
delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:
Tbe claimant was collector of internal revenue, and as sucb a bonded disbursing’ officer {Aet March 1, 1879, ch. 125, § 2, amending Rev. Stat., § 3144, 1 Supp. Rev. Stat,, 424) from July 1, 1881, to June 30,1885.
He appointed one Mecklenburg, August 1, 1882, one of bis deputies, at a salary of $1,500 a year, as provided by tbe same act (1 Supp. Rev. Stat., 425), and reported tbe fact to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, and continued his name on bis annual report of tbe “organization of tbe district” during tbe *452time covered by the claim…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. GermaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- United States v. MacDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- United States v. O'GradySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Converse v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- United States v. BrindleSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Walker v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Alabama · 1905
- Erwin v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1889
- Duval v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1889
- Hillborn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1892
- Barlow v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.