Barlow v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtBooth, Chief Justice
This patent case comes to the coui’t under the special jurisdictional act set forth in Finding 1. No jurisdictional issue is raised and hence it is not essential to repeat the terms of the act in this opinion, except to observe that the findings of fact, as well as the opinion of the court, shall be reported to Congress.
Plaintiff’s interest in aircraft bombs, the subject matter of the present case, originated from his experience with the revolutionary forces of Villa, and came about in the following way:
In 1914 plaintiff was in Mexico engaged in selling and installing tractors and while so…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. Locomotive Engine Safety Truck Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- De Forest Radio Telephone Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Blake v. San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- United States v. Société Anonyme Des Anciens Establissements CailSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Ordnance Engineering Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fulmer v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1949
- Farrand Optical Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Barlow v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937
- Barlow v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1943