National Labor Relations Board v. Kent Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GODBOLD, Circuit Judge:
The Board found that the employer Kent: interfered with, restrained and coerced its employees in violation of § 8(a)(1); violated §§ 8(a)(2) and (1) by interfering with the internal affairs and administration of the unaffiliated local union and by assisting it in opposing an organizational campaign conducted by the Boilermakers’ Union; violated §§ 8(a)(3) and (1), by discriminatorily discharging nine employees; violated §§ 8(a)(4), (3) and (1) by discharging six employees who signed unfair labor practice charges filed against Kent by the Boilermakers and refused to…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Bristol-Meyers Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Kent Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- The National Labor Relations Board v. Kent CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- United Steelworkers of America v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- United Steelworkers of America v. National Labor Relations Board, Florida Steel Corporation, Intervenor. Florida Steel Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, United Steelworkers of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.