Legal Opinion
United States v. Daniel Pedrosa Fuentes
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 17, 1992No. 90-1929PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
STAPLETON, Circuit Judge:
This appeal presents the issue of whether a defendant in a federal criminal prosecution can be sentenced under United States Sentencing Guideline § 3B1.1 as a “supervisor” or “manager” in the absence of evidence that he or she directed the activities of at least one other person. 1 The district court found that Daniel Pedro-sa Fuentes had been a “supervisor” or “manager” without such evidence because he had “managed a crackhouse.” Because we disagree with the district court’s interpretation of § 3B1.1, we will vacate the sentence and remand to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Adegboyega AkitoyeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Leonard R. FullerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Lloyd Michael ReidCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Antonio Ruben Inigo, United States of America v. Raul Armando Giordano, United States of America v. Bruno SkerianzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Santiago Mares-MolinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- United States v. ColladoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Andrew M. Harvey, IIICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Ronald BelletiereCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Lisa Gort-DidonatoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Jose Antonio Caseslorente,defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.