Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Channell

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 6, 1918No. 21,432PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from Cowley district court; Oliver P. Fuller, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

Defendant The Rush Manufacturing Company appeals from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs quieting title to real property in Arkansas City. Martha A. Wilson died intestate owning the real property in controversy and owning personal property of the value of about $60. She left surviving her, as her heirs, H. O. Wilson and the plaintiffs, W. R. Wilson and Clara I. Jordan. H. 0.. Wilson was indebted to’ Martha A. Wilson, at the time of her death, in a sum equal to more than one-third of the value of the real property. That indebtedness had…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holden v. SpierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  2. Stenson v. H. S. Halvorson Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Marvin v. BowlbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Head v. SpierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  5. Goodnough v. WebberSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of FerrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  2. Thompson v. McCuneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. In Re Estate of ClaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Woods v. KnottsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  5. In Re Smith's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1934

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API