Legal Opinion

City of Las Vegas v. Laughlin

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1995No. 25727PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

FACTS

Appellants, as members of the City Council of Las Vegas, Nevada (“the City”), challenge the propriety of the district court’s order granting a petition for a writ of mandamus ordering the City to issue a special use permit to respondent Donald J. Laughlin (“Laughlin”). The City argues that its decision to deny Laughlin’s request for a special use permit was supported by substantial evidence. We agree and reverse the order of the district court.

DISCUSSION

Like the district court, this court is limited to the record made before the City in reviewing the City’s decision. See State ex.…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. State Employment Security Department v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State Ex Rel. Johns v. GragsonNevada Supreme Court · 1973
  4. City Council of Reno v. Travelers HotelNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Clark County Liquor & Gaming Licensing Board v. Simon & Tucker, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Redrock Valley Ranch, LLC v. Washoe CountyNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Sengel v. IGTNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  3. AllEnergy Corporation v. Trempealeau County Environment & Land Use CommitteeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Stratosphere Gaming Corp. v. City of Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Enterprise Citizens Action Committee v. Clark County Board of CommissionersNevada Supreme Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API