Legal Opinion

Stratosphere Gaming Corp. v. City of Las Vegas

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 2004No. 40788PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This appeal challenges the Las Vegas City Council’s denial of appellant Stratosphere Resort & Casino’s site development plan application to develop a thrill ride. The Stratosphere petitioned the district court for a writ of mandamus and filed a complaint for declaratory relief. The district court denied the petition and dismissed the complaint. We affirm the district court’s order.

FACTS

Appellant Stratosphere Resort & Casino (the Stratosphere) applied to the City of Las Vegas (City) for a site development plan review to construct a proposed ride located at 2000 and 2035 Las Vegas…

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Greenbriar, Ltd. v. City Of AlabasterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  4. State Employment Security Department v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. CMC of Nevada, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Redrock Valley Ranch, LLC v. Washoe CountyNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Finkel v. CASHMAN PROFESSIONAL, INC.Nevada Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Shores v. Global Experience Specialists, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2018
  4. SHORES VS. GLOBAL EXPERIENCE SPECIALISTS, INC.Nevada Supreme Court · 2018
  5. SHORES VS. GLOBAL EXPERIENCE SPECIALISTS, INC.Nevada Supreme Court · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API