Legal Opinion

People v. Jackson

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 22, 2007PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

In a rape prosecution, evidence of a prior uncharged sexual assault against another and defendant’s simultaneously uttered out-of-court statement were admitted under Molineux to demonstrate defendant’s motive and future intent to rape the victim in this case. The witness testified, “[the defendant] told me that [the victim] was lucky I was there, because if I wasn’t there, it would be her.”

Assuming that it was error to admit both the statement and the uncharged criminal conduct, the error was harmless.*…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. NievesNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. People v. ArroyoNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. SchulzNew York Court of Appeals · 2005

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. People v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. People v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. People v. MaxwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API