People v. Jackson
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
In a rape prosecution, evidence of a prior uncharged sexual assault against another and defendant’s simultaneously uttered out-of-court statement were admitted under Molineux to demonstrate defendant’s motive and future intent to rape the victim in this case. The witness testified, “[the defendant] told me that [the victim] was lucky I was there, because if I wasn’t there, it would be her.”
Assuming that it was error to admit both the statement and the uncharged criminal conduct, the error was harmless.*…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. NievesNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. ArroyoNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. SchulzNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
3Cited by23 opinions
- People v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. MaxwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.