Legal Opinion
Kirkham v. Société Air France
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 13, 2006No. Civil Action No. 03-1083 (JDB)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BATES, District Judge.
Defendant Société Air France (“Air France”) has moved to strike the designation of plaintiffs two expert witnesses or, in the alternative, to compel plaintiff to file expert reports pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2)(B). Plaintiff contends that the two expert witnesses are her treating physicians and, as such, are not required to provide expert reports.1 The Court concludes that the exclusion of expert testimony would not be reasonable in light of the ongoing expert discovery in this case, and the good faith basis for disagreement, and hence only…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mischelle Musser and Michael Musser v. Gentiva Health Services, F/k/a Olsten Health ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Gomez-Candelaria v. Rivera-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Patel v. GayesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Sullivan v. Glock, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1997
- Wreath v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Aumand v. Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical CenterDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009
- Hancock v. Washington Hospital CenterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Owens-Hart v. Howard UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Bynum v. MVM, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Roberson v. BairDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.