Legal Opinion

AXA Assurance, Inc. v. Chase Manhattan Bank

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 3, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

CARCHMAN, J.A.D.

This appeal requires us to reconcile two assertedly disparate clauses contained in a letter of credit (the letter). The first clause, referred to as an “evergreen” clause, provides for annual automatic renewal of the letter of credit without notice. The second clause, referred to as the “expiry” clause, provides a fixed termination date for the letter. Judge Stephen F. Smith, Jr., in the Law Division, held that the expiry clause governed and granted summary judgment in favor of defendant Chase Manhattan Bank (the bank2). We agree with…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Terminal Construction Corp. v. Bergen County Hackensack River Sanitary Sewer District AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  2. In Re the Estate of MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. Krosnowski v. KrosnowskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  4. Chase Manhattan Bank v. EquibankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  5. Bank of North Carolina, N.A. v. The Rock Island Bank, an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morris Silverman Management Corp. v. Western Union Financial Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
  2. AXA Assurance, Inc. v. Chase Manhattan BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
  3. J.P. Morgan Trust Co. v. U.S. Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API