Legal Opinion

William C. Marshall v. State of Oregon Manfred Maass, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 3, 1994No. 93-35542Published

1Opinion of the Court

37 F.3d 1505

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

William C. MARSHALL, Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

STATE OF OREGON; Manfred Maass, Superintendent, Oregon

State Penitentiary, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 93-35542.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 6, 1994.

Decided Oct. 3, 1994.

Before: ALARCON, NORRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API