Legal Opinion
Matter of Sarvis
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided February 5, 1979No. 97PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUSKINS, Justice.
Our unemployment compensation statute, in pertinent part, disqualifies an individual for benefits “[f]or any week with respect to which the Commission finds that his total or partial unemployment is caused by a labor dispute in active progress ... at the factory, establishment or other premises at which he is or was last employed. . . .” G.S. 96-14(5).
In order for the labor dispute disqualification to apply, the Commission must find the unemployment in question was “caused by a labor dispute in active progress.” The central issue in this appeal is whether Employees’…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Lodge 76, International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Youngdahl v. Rainfair, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- National Labor Relations Board v. Nash-Finch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Nash v. Florida Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Geo. A. Hormel & Co. v. AsperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- John Morrell & Co. v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Building Products Co. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Brannan Sand & Gravel Co. v. Industrial Claim AppealsColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
- Williams v. Teledyne Continental Motors Aircraft ProductsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.