Legal Opinion
Jones v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 14, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2016-0085PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TANYA S. CHUTEAN, United States District Judge
In the instant case, Plaintiffs Vaughn Jones and Antonio Pixley assert four causes of action' against Defendants: (i) failure to afford due process; (ii) municipal liability; (iii) fraud and deceit; and (iv) intentional infliction of emotional distress. (See Am. Compl. ¶¶ 138-82). 1
This case was removed to this court from the Superior Court for the District of Columbia in January 2016. Prior-to -removal, Superior Court Judge Geoffrey M. Alp-rin issued a temporary restraining order (the “TRO”), which Defendants now move to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Munaf v. GerenSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ahuruonye v. U.S. Dep't of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Arriva Medical LLC v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Jones v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Little v. Llano CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
- Ahuruonye v. Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.