Legal Opinion

Landford v. Universal Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 29, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

These are three actions of contract tried together, wherein the plaintiff seeks to recover fire insurance under four policies purporting to cover a one-story summer restaurant building known as “Ye Turnpike Inn” in New-bury, Massachusetts. All the policies were in the form prescribed by G. L. c. 175, § 99, and in all of them one Leslie R. Brown was named as the insured. Each policy contained a clause that the “Loss, if any, on real estate” was payable to the plaintiff as “First Mortgagee.” The property is described as follows: “one story summer restaurant building and additions thereto,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moulton v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. Noyes v. GagnonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  3. Swift v. BoydMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. Hartwell v. KellyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  5. Ryder v. FaxonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. J. & T. Enterprises, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. Hannah v. FrawleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Commerce Bank & Trust Co. v. Centennial InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API