Legal Opinion

United States v. John Russell Karnap

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 20, 1973No. 72-2000PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALBERT V. BRYAN, Jr., District Judge:

Complaining that hearsay evidence was admitted against him and that he never received the order to report for induction, the defendant appeals his conviction on both counts of a two-count indictment charging (1) that he wilfully and knowingly failed to report for an Armed Forces physical examination, and (2) that he similarly failed to report for induction. 50 U.S.C. App. § 462. We affirm on both counts.

At his trial the evidence introduced by the United States included the classification questionnaire, Form 100, from the defendant’s Selective Service file…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dit La Porte v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. United States v. George Anderson Bowen, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  3. United States v. Albert H. HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
  4. United States v. Cossie Burruss, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
  5. Robert Benjamin Pardo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Thomas E. KeaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  2. Brown v. ASD Computing CenterDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1981
  3. United States v. Daniel Bethea, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
  4. United States v. HillDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API