Legal Opinion

Wilmurth v. First Judicial District Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1964No. 4752PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, C. J.:

The petition for a writ of mandate now before the court raises 1 the following question: Will the remedy of mandamus lie to compel the respondent court to vacate a pre-trial order made by it, on the ground that petitioners had not participated in the pre-trial conference— such failure to participate being the willful absence of petitioners from the pre-trial conference after due notice thereof. (Counsel for petitioners herein, as counsel for plaintiffs in the main action then pending in the respondent court, had willfully absented themselves from the pre-trial…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Charles Resnik v. La Paz Guest RanchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  2. Amerigo Padovani v. Honorable Walter BruchhausenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  3. Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  4. Floyd v. District Court of the Sixth Judicial DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Hoole v. KinkeadNevada Supreme Court · 1881

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Rust v. Clark County School DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Marks v. VehlowIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Dzack v. MarshallNevada Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Knox v. DickNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API