Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Hill & Hill Truck Line, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided April 27, 1960No. Civ. A. Nos. 11033, 11867, 11883PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
INGRAHAM, District Judge.
These are consolidated actions by former employees of defendant brought individually by Culpepper and Miller and by the Secretary of Labor of the United States in behalf of Teel, Kizzee, Jones, Potts, Singleton, and Jiles for unpaid compensation and liquidated damages allegedly due to said employees for overtime work during the term of their employment, as provided by the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201-219. The cases were tried before the court without a jury and are submitted for judgment upon the briefs of the parties.
The controversy centers on the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Levinson v. Spector Motor ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Pyramid Motor Freight Corp. v. IspassSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Foremost Dairies, Inc. v. Ivey Ivey v. Foremost Dairies, IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- McKeown v. Southern California Freight ForwardersDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- John T. Blankenship, Gerald Wayne Hodges and Virgil Olen McDonald v. Thurston Motor Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
- Texas Farm Products Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966