Legal Opinion

Render & Hammett v. Hartford Fire Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 16, 1925No. 15888, 15889PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

Whether one of the bills of exceptions should be considered as a main bill and the other as a cross-bill need not be determined. We will, however, consider both bills in one opinion.

We have no hesitancy in holding that in cases where service upon a principal may be had by service upon his agent, it is the duty of the agent to notify his principal of that fact when service is so made. In the absence of a waiver a party can not be held to a suit without service, and where the law provides for service upon a principal by service upon its agent,- it necessarily…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Citizens & Southern Bank v. Union Warehouse & Compress Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  2. Jones v. Bibb Brick Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Love v. National Liberty InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  4. May v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  5. Williams v. Moore-Gaunt Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Gloria L. Schrader v. Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  2. Co-Op Mortgage Investments Associates v. PendleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. Anderson v. REDWAL MUSIC COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  4. Cutcliffe v. ChesnutCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  5. Taylor Lumber Co. v. Clark Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API