Legal Opinion

Argo Plastic Products Co. v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1984No. 83-1920PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, C.J.

The question facing this court in the present case is whether the trial court erred in denying the city’s request for relief under Civ. R. 60(B). For the following reasons, we hold that the trial court properly denied the relief from judgment requested by the city.

Civ. R. 60(B) provides in relevant part:

“On motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party or his legal representative from a final judgment, order or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect; * * *.”

In GTE Automatic Electric v. ARC Industries (1976), 47…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Colley v. BazellOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Svoboda v. City of BrunswickOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Blasco v. MislikOhio Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Griffey v. RajanOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Moore v. Emmanuel Family Training Center, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Horkins v. Quality Chevrolet, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Miamisburg Motel v. Huntington National BankOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Volodkevich v. VolodkevichOhio Supreme Court · 1988

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API