Legal Opinion
Palmer v. Inhabitants of Sumner
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided March 11, 1935PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHudson, J.
Action on the case for personal injuries, based on the Workmen’s Compensation Act (see Chapter 55, R. S. 1930, *338and amendments thereto) and before this Court on the following agreed statement of facts:
“1. That at the time the plaintiff received the injuries ' complained of John F. Redding was the duly appointed and qualified Road Commissioner for the Town of Sumner.
“2. That the said John F. Redding in his capacity as Road Commissioner for said Town of Sumner hired the plaintiff, Richard Palmer, to take charge of the construction of the road on Potash Hill in said Town.
“3. That said plaintiff,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ryalls v. Mechanics' MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Todd v. Dowd's heirsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1858
- Hawks v. Inhabitants of CharlemontMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Ashton v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Robinson's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Finks v. Maine State Highway CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- Emery Waterhouse Co. v. LeaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- Rubin v. JosephsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- Thompson v. DaleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
- State v. ThibeaultSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.