State v. Bach
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was tried and convicted in the district court for Good-hue county, before McCluer, J., and a jury, on an indictment charging him with “the crime of selling malt liquor in a less quantity than five gallons, without first having obtained license therefor, ” and stating that defendant at a time and place named, “did unlawfully sell to one Charles Olson Uggla one pint of malt liquor, commonly called lager beer, of the value of five cents, he, the said Gottlieb Bach,…
Read the full summary
Defendant was tried and convicted in the district court for Good-hue county, before McCluer, J., and a jury, on an indictment charging him with “the crime of selling malt liquor in a less quantity than five gallons, without first having obtained license therefor, ” and stating that defendant at a time and place named, “did unlawfully sell to one Charles Olson Uggla one pint of malt liquor, commonly called lager beer, of the value of five cents, he, the said Gottlieb Bach, not-having a license to sell said liquor, contrary to the form of the statute,”' etc. He appeals from an order refusing a…
1Opinion of the CourtGileillan, C. J.
Indictment for selling malt liquor without license. Most of the assignments of error are covered by decisions of this court. That the district court has jurisdiction to indict and try for the offence was decided by State v. Kobe, 26 Minn. 148, (1 N. W. Rep. 1054.) In that case we construed the statute, and held that it intended to leave such jurisdiction in the district court. Our attention is now called to the provisions of section 5, article 6, and section 8, article 6, of the constitution, which it is claimed have some bearing on the construction of the statute. It was decided by this…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gerrish v. PrattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1861
- State v. LavakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
- State v. SchmailSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- State v. CronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
- State v. LangdonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Henning v. WinemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Hornberger v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- City of Montpelier v. MillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- City of Jordan v. BespalecSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Koch v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.