Daneker v. State Employes' Retirement Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Judge.
Karen V. Daneker appeals from an order of the State Employes’ Retirement Board (SERB) granting her a non-permanent disability retirement annuity but basing those benefits on a non-service connected disability. In an issue of first impression before this court, we must determine whether, under the State Employees’ Retirement Code (Code), 71 Pa.C.S. §§ 5101-5956, and the regulations promulgated thereunder, the SERB may grant service connected disability retirement benefits to a claimant without a prior award to that claimant under The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bevilacqua v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Boeing Vertol Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Leo v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Wengrzyn v. CohenCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Clark v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Unified Sportsmen of Pennsylvania Ex Rel. Their Members v. Pennsylvania Game CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Waters v. State Employees' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Shafer v. State Employes' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995