Legal Opinion

Clarke & Cohen v. Hartman Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 11, 1931No. Appeals 222 and 223PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

These appeals, in their controlling features, including the original form of action in assumpsit against an insurance company on a policy of fire insurance, petition by the defendant therein for leave to pay the fund into court and for an interpleader, the order awarding such interpleader and fixing the issues to be tried, and the subsequent vacating and setting aside of said order and directing the payment of the fund in court to the plaintiffs in said original actions (defendants in said issues), are concerned with practically the same questions as were considered by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. StinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Clarke & Cohen v. Real Ex Rel. Stroudsburg Nat. BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Bowers Co. v. London Assurance Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Light v. Countrymen's Mutual Fire Insurance Co. of Lebanon Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  5. Wunderlich v. Palatine Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Turner Construction Co. v. John B. Kelly Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Campbell v. Royal Indem. Co. of NYSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Wharen v. Markle Banking & Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Snyder v. Munroe, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Adams County1960
  5. Freystown Mutual Fire Insurance v. Whited, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Adams County1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API