Legal Opinion
Arce v. Banks
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 6, 1996No. 94 Civ. 8749 (JES)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge:
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff George Arce, acting pro se, brings the instant action against defendant Jean Banks, 1 alleging that Banks, a prison nurse, interfered with his right to discuss a medical procedure with a prison surgeon in violation of his First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), defendant Banks moves to dismiss the complaint. For the reasons that follow, defendant’s motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
At all times relevant to the instant action, plaintiff George Arce…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Chance v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Chance v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Shabazz v. ColeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
- Collymore v. Commissioner of D.O.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
- Brown v. StoneDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.