Cisco v. United Parcel Services, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CERCONE, Judge:
This appeal is taken from an order sustaining preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer to appellant Joseph Cisco’s complaint in trespass. The trial court held that the criminal charges which were filed against Cisco provided his employer, United Parcel Service, appellee herein, with a plausible and legitimate reason for terminating his employment, and that no public policy was violated thereby. It, therefore, found that no cause of action was possible and dismissed the complaint. We affirm.
The averments of the complaint disclose that appellant, Joseph Cisco, was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Pierce v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Reuther v. Fowler & Williams, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Yaindl v. Ingersoll-Rand Co. Standard Pump-Aldrich DivisionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Buchanan v. Brentwood Federal Savings & Loan Assoc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Field v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Darlington v. General ElectricSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Pelagatti v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Fraser v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Weaver v. HarpsterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.