Legal Opinion

Ralston Purina Co. v. Commissioner of Revenue

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 12, 1975No. 45435PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

The issue in this case involves the application of the three-factor formula for allocation of net income of a business carried on partly within and partly without this state. Minn. St. 290.19.

Ralston Purina Company, the taxpayer, is based in St. Louis, Missouri, and is authorized to do business in Minnesota. It manufactures and sells food products both within and without Minnesota. Its sales in Minnesota are generated through independent broker representatives which have their offices in Minnesota and solicit orders for Ralston from Minnesota customers, principally from…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. The Maytag Co. v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Olympia Brewing Co. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Grain Belt Breweries, Inc. v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API