United States v. Hudson

OPINION OP THE COURT

HANSEN, Chief Judge:

Convicted by a special court-martial of possessing and selling marijuana,* the appellant now complains in this appeal that the military judge’s instructions were prejudicially erroneous. In particular, he contends he was substantially prejudiced by the failure of the military judge to give instructions on accomplice testimony, judicial notice, prior inconsistent statements, and circumstantial evidence. The appellant also contends that the military judge erred by giving all except procedural instructions prior to closing arguments by counsel.

It is not…