Legal Opinion

Federal Paving Co. v. Raschka

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 4, 1923No. 11,739PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

Action by appellee Raschka against appellants and appellees Maxwell and Clubine to recover for horse feed alleged to have been furnished appellees Maxwell and Clubine. Appellant Federal Paving Company was the general contractor in a road contract under the provisions of the State Highway Commission law. Appellant Fidelity Company was the surety upon the paving company’s bond. Appellee Clubine was a subcontractor under the paving company by its contract with him to do the grading upon the road involved in the contract, and appellee Maxwell was a bondsman for Clubine.

The action was in two…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. State ex rel. Leavenworth State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. National Live Stock Insurance v. SimmonsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. McDermott v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Franzen v. Southern Surety Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926
  2. C. S. Luck & Sons, Inc. v. BoatwrightSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
  3. Ohio Oil Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. State Ex Rel. Lawson v. Warren Br. Roads Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1945
  5. Dow-Par, Inc. v. Lee Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API