In re Appeal of C&M Developers Inc.
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County
1Opinion of the Court
DEVLIN SCOTT,
C&M Developers Inc. has appealed the decision of the Bedminster Township Zoning Hearing Board denying C&M’s substantive challenge to the validity of the Bedminster Township Zoning Ordinance. C&M claims that the zoning ordinance is constitutionally invalid because it imposes unreasonable and extreme restrictions upon the development of single-family detached housing in the township’s AP-Agricultural Preservation Zoning District. For the reasons discussed below, we deny C&M’s appeal and affirm the decision of the board.
*73A review of the record and the board’s findings of fact reveals…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Valley View Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Hertzberg v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Bilbar Construction Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Concord Township AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Larsen v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.