Legal Opinion

In re Appeal of C&M Developers Inc.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County

Decided June 30, 2000No. 98-05738-19-6Published

1Opinion of the Court

DEVLIN SCOTT,

C&M Developers Inc. has appealed the decision of the Bedminster Township Zoning Hearing Board denying C&M’s substantive challenge to the validity of the Bedminster Township Zoning Ordinance. C&M claims that the zoning ordinance is constitutionally invalid because it imposes unreasonable and extreme restrictions upon the development of single-family detached housing in the township’s AP-Agricultural Preservation Zoning District. For the reasons discussed below, we deny C&M’s appeal and affirm the decision of the board.

*73A review of the record and the board’s findings of fact reveals…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Valley View Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Hertzberg v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Bilbar Construction Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Concord Township AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Larsen v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API