Legal Opinion

City of Cincinnati v. Mosier

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 30, 1939No. 5530PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By ROSS, PJ.

This is a direct appeal on questions of law from the Municipal Court of Cincinnati. The judgment to be reviewed was a sentence of the Municipal Court imposed after the verdict of a jury against the defendant. The defendant was charged in the affidavit, furnishing the basis for the prosecution, with having violated the ordinances of the City of Cincinnati, in that he unlawfully peddled books in the streets of the city without first having complied with the ordinances of the city requiring him to secure a peddler’s license.

The ordinances in question provide:

“Section 100.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Gitlow v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Jones v. OpelikaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. People v. BarberNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. Commonwealth v. RichardsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  5. Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc. v. LewisohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API