Hooban v. Unicity International, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
BENCH, Judge:
11 Defendant Unicity International, Inc. (Unicity) appeals the district court's denial of its request for statutory attorney fees after successfully defending against a contract-based suit brought by Plaintiff Roger Hoo-ban. Because the district court based its denial of statutory attorney fees on an erroneous legal interpretation of the applicable statute, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
BACKGROUND
T2 At a bankruptcy auction, Hooban purchased all outstanding stock in H & H Networking Services, Inc. (H & H), which had previously been wholly owned…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Giusti v. Sterling Wentworth Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
- Bilanzich v. LonettiUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. PetersenUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Anglin v. Contracting Fabrication MacHining, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2001
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hooban v. Unicity International, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2012
- Anderson & Karrenberg v. WarnickCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- PC Crane Service, LLC v. McQueen Masonry, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- Federated Capital Corp. v. HanerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
- Warner v. WarnerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.