Legal Opinion

McInnes v. Cannon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 15, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order modified by permitting an X-ray photograph to be taken in conjunction with a physical examination of the plaintiff, and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. This privilege, however, should not be abused, and should be limited to a time and place convenient to the plaintiff and by a physician designated by the court. (Hollister v. Robertson, 208 App. Div. 449.) Settle order on notice. Present — Dowling, P. J., Finch, McAvoy, Martin and O’Malley, JJ.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hollister v. RobertsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Pure Oil Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1937
  2. Feinberg v. Fairmont Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947