Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Murray

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 21, 1984No. 83-619PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We granted Petitioner's request to review the Court of Civil Appeals' denial of workmen's compensation benefits for failure to comply with the 5-day notice provision of Code 1975, §25-5-78. The suit was filed by James Marshall Murray against his employer, International Paper Company, to recover compensation for personal injury allegedly caused by an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment.

Defendant's answer denied that Marshall sustained an injury in the course of his employment and raised, as an affirmative defense, that Murray "failed to comply with the notice provisions…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alabama Textile Products Corporation v. GranthamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  2. Grimes v. Stith Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. Ragland Brick Co. v. CampbellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  4. International Paper Co. v. MurrayCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Russell Coal Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  2. Ex Parte MurraySupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Cook Transports, Inc. v. BeaversCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  4. Steele v. General Motors Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  5. Equity Group-Alabama Division v. HarrisCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API