Porobenski v. American Alliance Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mb. Justice Drew,
TMs is an action in assumpsit on a policy of fire insurance issued by defendant to plaintiff upon a barn and its contents. The policy contained the usual provision that “This entire policy shall be void ... if the interest of the insured be other than unconditional and sole ownership.” At the trial, plaintiff admitted that the property was held by himself and his wife as tenants by entireties, under a deed made to them jointly after their marriage. There was no proof that plaintiff had the entire beneficial ownership or that defendant or its agent had any notice as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Beihl v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Gasner v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Stuckey v. Keefe's ExecutorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
- McCurdy & Stevenson v. CanningSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
- Schroedel v. Humboldt Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Gallagher EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Clingerman v. SadowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Daley v. HornbakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Kanefsky v. National Commercial Mutual Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Stern v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.