Clackamas County Assessor v. Village at Main Street Phase II, LLC
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.
Once a tax assessor has determined the value of property and listed it on the assessment roll, the assessor may not correct the value listed on the assessment roll merely because he or she “would [now] arrive at a different opinion of value.” ORS 311.205(1)(b). An assessor, however, may add property to the assessment roll that “has from any cause been omitted, in whole or in part,” from the assessment roll. ORS 311.216. The question that this case poses is whether the Clackamas County tax assessor (the assessor) may add, as omitted property, the value of site developments to land already…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Stevens v. CzerniakOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- Mastriano v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- Klamath Irrigation District v. United StatesOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- Reynolds v. BowenIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Halperin v. PittsOregon Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. KeysOregon Supreme Court · 2021
- Petock v. AsanteOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- Village at Main Street Phase II, LLC v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Clackamas County Assessor v. Village at Main Street Phase II, LLCOregon Supreme Court · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.