Legal Opinion

Wieland v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 2006No. 49A02-0504-PC-357PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SULLIVAN, Judge.

Appellant, Stephen Wieland, challenges the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. Upon appeal, Wieland presents one issue for our review: whether his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to amend his brief on direct appeal in order to challenge his sentence in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000).

We affirm.

On February 10, 1998, Wieland was charged with Count I, murder; Count II, felony murder; Count III, robbery as a Class A felony; Count IV, felony murder; Count V, attempted robbery as a Class A…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Timberlake v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Bieghler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Fisher v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Maymon v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Bobby D. Wine v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Brian E. Connell v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Daimia Anderson v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API