Legal Opinion
Brittingham v. Gove-Ortmeyer
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided March 30, 2016No. 2:13CV00089 ERWPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
E. RICHARD WEBBER, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Stacie Gove-Ortmeyer’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 80].
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff James Brittingham (“Plaintiff’) filed his Third Amended Complaint (“Complaint”) against Defendant Stacie Gove-Ortmeyer (“Defendant”) on December 2, 2014. [ECF No. 42]. In this Complaint, Plaintiff asserts eleven counts against Defendant Gove-Ortmeyer, in her individual capacity. Id. Among the counts alleged are seven arising under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as an additional four counts…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Alsbrook v. City Of MaumelleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.