Lee, Black, Hart & Rouse, P.C. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
RUFFIN, Presiding Judge.
After an employee of Lee, Black, Hart & Rouse, EC. (the “firm”), allegedly stole money from the law firm’s escrow account, the firm recovered a portion of the loss from The Travelers Indemnity Company (“Travelers”), which provided insurance coverage for losses caused by “employee dishonesty.” The firm sued Travelers, seeking to recover additional payment. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment, and the trial court granted Travelers’ motion and denied the firm’s motion. The firm appeals. Finding no error, we affirm.
A trial court properly grants summary…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kay-Lex Co. v. Essex InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Cincinnati Insurance v. Magnolia Estates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Sherman & Hemstreet, Inc. v. Cincinnati InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- In Re EarleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001