Legal Opinion

Lee, Black, Hart & Rouse, P.C. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 5, 2008No. A08A0353Published

1Opinion of the Court

RUFFIN, Presiding Judge.

After an employee of Lee, Black, Hart & Rouse, EC. (the “firm”), allegedly stole money from the law firm’s escrow account, the firm recovered a portion of the loss from The Travelers Indemnity Company (“Travelers”), which provided insurance coverage for losses caused by “employee dishonesty.” The firm sued Travelers, seeking to recover additional payment. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment, and the trial court granted Travelers’ motion and denied the firm’s motion. The firm appeals. Finding no error, we affirm.

A trial court properly grants summary…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kay-Lex Co. v. Essex InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  2. Cincinnati Insurance v. Magnolia Estates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  3. Sherman & Hemstreet, Inc. v. Cincinnati InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  4. In Re EarleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API