Legal Opinion

Kay-Lex Co. v. Essex Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 10, 2007No. A07A0791, A07A0792PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Adams, Judge.

Two insurance carriers filed a declaratory judgment action to determine their responsibilities in connection with a lawsuit arising out of a forklift accident. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the carriers. The two parties seeking coverage filed separate appeals. Those appeals have been consolidated for our review.

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). We review a grant or denial of summary judgment de novo and construe the evidence in the light…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Home Builders Ass'n of Savannah, Inc. v. Chatham CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  2. Veal v. Security Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  3. Protective Insurance v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  4. Allstate Insurance v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  5. Federated Mutual Insurance v. Ownbey Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Lavoi Corp. v. National Fire Insurance of HartfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Walnut Avenue Partners, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  3. Plantation Pipe Line Co. v. Stonewall InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  4. Forshee v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  5. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Lloyd LeBlanc, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API