Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Norwich Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 4, 1891PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Muscatine District Court. — Hon. C. H. Waterman, Judge. ACTION upon a policy of fire insurance. There was judgment upon a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, C. J.

I. The policy in suit was issued to Charles H. Bartlett, and covered a stock of eggs, and packages and vats containing the same, owned by him, or hpld in trust or kept for sale, or sold, and not delivered. The property insured, with the building containing it, was destroyed by fire. After the loss, Bartlett assigned his policy and his right thereunder to Cook, Musser & Co., and S. G. Kelly, to secure indebtedüess due to the assignees separately. Cook, Musser & Co. assigned their interest in the policy and their claim thereunder to S. G. Kelly. The defendant answered the petition alleging that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weil v. LowenthalSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860
  2. Lutz v. KellySupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  3. Melhop v. Doane & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  4. Bates v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  5. Smith v. GriffinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Mahr v. Norwich Union Fire Insurance SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. State ex rel. Western Construction Co. v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Searles v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  5. Snouffer & Ford v. City of TiptonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API