Legal Opinion

Cornett v. Prather

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 5, 1987No. 87-89Published

1Opinion of the Court

737 S.W.2d 159 (1987)

293 Ark. 108

Paul CORNETT and Michael Smith, Appellants,

v.

Michael PRATHER, Appellee.

No. 87-89.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

October 5, 1987.

W.H. Taylor, Springdale, for appellants.

Ray Bunch, Rogers, for appellee.

PURTLE, Justice.

The petition for rehearing is granted because we originally limited the appeal to the sole question of whether or not the jury verdict was supported by any substantial evidence. 293 Ark. 108, 732 S.W.2d 469. The issue was so limited by our Per Curiam styled Cornett v. Prather, 290 Ark. 262, 718 S.W.2d 433 (1986). We now hold that the appeal should not…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rosenblatt v. BaerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Cornett v. PratherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. Dongary Holstein Leasing, Inc. v. CovingtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. Lancaster v. Daily Banner-News Pub. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  5. Fort Smith Symphony Orchestra, Inc. v. Fort Smith Symphony Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API