Legal Opinion

Cornett v. Prather

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 5, 1987No. 87-89PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John I. Purtle, Justice.

The petition for rehearing is granted because we originally limited the appeal to the sole question of whether or not the jury verdict was supported by any substantial evidence. The issue was so limited by our Per Curiam styled Cornett v. Prather, 290 Ark. 262, 718 S.W.2d 433 (1986). We now hold that the appeal should not have been so limited, and reverse and remand for a new trial.

This appeal involves a defamation action brought by appellee Michael Prather against appellants Paul Cornett and Michael Smith. The complaint alleged that the appellants published defamatory…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rosenblatt v. BaerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Fort Smith Symphony Orchestra, Inc. v. Fort Smith Symphony Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  3. Cornett v. PratherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Slaton v. SlatonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Wise Co., Inc. v. CLAY CIRCUIT, EASTERN DIST.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Dodge v. LeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Malik Muntaqim v. Dexter Payne and Wendy Kelley, Directors, Arkansas Department of Correction; Anthony Jackson, Deputy Warden of the Ouachita River Correctional Unit; Steve Outlaw, Deputy Warden; Chris Menotti, Sergeant; Willie Moore, Chaplain; Dan Flora, Chaplain; James Gibson, Warden of the Varner Supermax Unit; And Virginia Allen, Mailroom Supervisor, All in Their Individual and Official CapacitiesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2021
  5. White River Levee District v. ReidharCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API