Legal Opinion · Dissent

Railroad Commission of Texas v. Entex, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1980No. B-8584Published

1DissentPope, Justice

I dissent.

The Railroad Commission and the majority have reverted to the discredited rule which applies the rate of return to the original cost depreciated. That rate base is contrary to the fair value method that was approved in Railroad Commission v. Houston Natural Gas Corp., 155 Tex. 502, 289 S.W.2d 559 (1956), prior to the adoption of the Public Utilities Regulatory Act, and it violates the statutory scheme for a fair return that is spelled out in sections 39, 40, and 41 of article 1446c. This court has previously approved and the legislature has required a method by which a return is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. General Telephone Co. of the SoutheastSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utility CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Railroad Commission v. Houston Natural Gas Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1956
  5. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API