Legal Opinion

Railroad Commission v. Houston Natural Gas Corp.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1956No. A-5557PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson

The problem here is to give the capital invested in public utilities the attributes of property protected by constitutional due process in a situation where there is in fact generally no competition, no true barter and sale, and the business operates under governmental regulation. During the last three-quarters of a century the judicial effort to cast this problem in legal terms which will meet the test of confiscation under the Federal Due Process clause has absorbed some of the best efforts of the great operative minds of our law. A few of these are Gray, Holmes, Hughes, Learned Hand,…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Lower Colorado River Authority v. City of San MarcosTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Suburban Utility Corp. v. Public Utility CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation, Inc. v. LewellenTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Southern Canal Co. v. State Board of Water EngineersTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utility CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1978

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API