Legal Opinion
In the Matter of the Workmen's Compensation of Feliberto Fresquez v. Farnsworth & Chambers Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 2, 1956No. 5389_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRATTON, Chief Judge.
This is an action by Feliberto Fresquez against Farnsworth and Chambers Company to recover judgment for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act of New Mexico, 9 N.M.S.A. 1953, § 59-10-1 et seq. The action was instituted in the state court and was removed to the United States Court. The ground of removal was diversity of citizenship with the requisite amount in controversy. Plaintiff filed a motion to remand and defendant filed a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment. The court denied the motion to remand and entered judgment dismissing the action. Plaintiff…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Dennick v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Pollard v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Terral v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. SowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Green River Drainage AreaDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1956
- Pennhurst State School v. Estate of GoodhartzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Ortega v. ShubeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Sanchez v. ReeseNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- Carson Construction Co. v. Fuller-Webb ConstructionDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.