Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Sanchez v. Reese

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1968No. 8733PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

• OPINION

MOISE, Justice.

We have heretofore issued our alternative writ of mandamus directing the respondent to withdraw an instruction previously given the clerk of the court presided over by him and to enter an order directing that petitioner’s workmen’s compensation claim be filed without payment of a fee of $3.50. The respondent, having answered, and the case having been fully briefed and argued, it is now ripe for decision.

The question involved is simply whether the fee of $3.50 levied by ch. 20, N.M.S.L. 1964 (1st S.S.) (2 N.M.S.A.1953, Appendix 2.2) must be collected from those filing…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. State Park & Recreation Commission v. New Mexico State AuthorityNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Lipe v. BradburyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Hudson v. Herschbach Drilling Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
  4. C. De Baca v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Guthrie v. Threlkeld Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. SegottaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Burroughs v. BD. OF CTY. COM'RS, CTY., BERNALILLONew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Westgate Families v. County Clerk of the Inc. County of Los AlamosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Texas National Theatres, Inc. v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Mitchell v. C & H Transportation Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API