Legal Opinion

Harllel B. Jones, Cross-Appellant v. A. R. Jago, Superintendent, Cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 3, 1978No. 77-3182 and 77-3183PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENGEL, Circuit Judge.

This appeal presents an unusual question concerning the applicability of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), and United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97, 96 S.Ct. 2392, 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976), and whether under those cases an eyewitness statement suppressed by the government can be exculpatory where it makes no reference to the defendant.

Harllel Jones was convicted in the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County, Ohio, of murder in the second degree and of shooting with intent to kill or wound. Having exhausted his state court remedies both in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Arnold R. Jago, Superintendent v. United States District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division at Cleveland, and Harllel B. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  5. Andrew Lee Wagster v. Roger T. OverbergCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. Richard D. EnrightCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  2. Harllel B. Jones v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  3. State v. MarshallCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  4. Harllel B. Jones v. Robert ShanklandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  5. William L. Campbell, III v. R.C. Marshall the Attorney General of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API