Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

William D. Allen v. Mandy Bondy, et al.

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided May 4, 2026No. 3:26-cv-00375Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION WILLIAM D. ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:26-CV-375-TLS-AZ MANDY BONDY, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER William D. Allen, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a complaint. ECF 2. “A document filed pro se is to be liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however inartfully pleaded, must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.” Erickson v. Pardus,

551 U.S. 89, 94

(2007) (cleaned up). Nevertheless, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the court must review the merits of a prisoner…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Mhammad Abu-Shawish v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  5. Manuel v. City of JolietSupreme Court of the United States · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API