Legal Opinion
In Re Hill
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California
Decided February 13, 2013No. 19-00411PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDERS ON TRUSTEE’S MOTIONS TO DISMISS
PETER W. BOWIE, Chief Judge.
The above-captioned cases were heard on the same date and involve a common issue of law. Specifically, the Chapter 13 Trustee has moved to dismiss both cases because they have exceeded 60 months in length. Debtors in both cases oppose, and ask for more time to complete performance under their respective plans.
This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over both cases pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334 and General Order No. 312-D of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. These are core proceedings…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re BlackUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1987
- In Re HarterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 2002
- In Re BrownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2003
- In Re HenryUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
3Cited by9 opinions
- Paul Klaas v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- In re: Steven Patrick Schlegel Joanne Marie SchlegelUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Porenta v. PorentaUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- Winnecour v. Klaas (In re Klaas)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- In re Brian T.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.