Legal Opinion

Winnecour v. Klaas (In re Klaas)

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 4, 2015No. Case No. 09-29574-GLTPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GREGORY L. TADDONIO, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE

This case presents the question of whether a debtor must fully and completely perform all obligations under a confirmed chapter 13 plan within a 60-month time limit, after which any curative payment is precluded. After 60 months elapsed in this bankruptcy case, the Debtors needed an additional $1,123 to complete the funding of their chapter 13 plan. Although the Debtors subsequently provided the necessary payment, one creditor seeks dismissal of this case on the basis that the plan payment period cannot be extended beyond…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Marrama v. Citizens Bank of Mass.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. In Re Ernest R. Lilley, Jr., Debtor. Ernest R. Lilley, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  3. In Re WoodallUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1987
  4. Aubain v. LaSalle National Bank (In Re Aubain)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2003
  5. In Re WhiteUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Paul Klaas v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  2. Shovlin v. KlaasDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Shovlin v. Klaas (In re Klaas)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API